7
$\begingroup$

First: Thank you everyone who helped this site survive the Area51 process, and who helped this site grow so far during the first 3 weeks in Beta!!! We would not have this site without you!!!

Now we are in Beta. To be considered to graduate from Beta, we need to consistently get at least 10 questions/day:

Some sites have been in Beta for almost 3000 days, despite having more than 27000 users, before being fully launched.

For the next, perhaps 3000 days (or however many days it takes up to reach 10 questions/day for a long enough period of time), if our site is un-sponsored, we will not have a "logo" or "branding", so we will have this basic look-and-feel:

This will look the same as some other un-sponsored Beta sites:

Sponsored Beta sites look much better, and do not have the "Beta" label, notice on the right-side that a sponsors logo will be advertised:






We are also affected in places like this:


   
  

We are also affected in places like this (notice that Quantum Computing and Physics have a logo, but Materials Science has a just a generic "MAT"):

enter image description here


So do we want a sponsor or not?

Background: In August 2019 I suggested to the SE team that we could get a sponsor but it was perhaps too early in our Area51 journey, and we did not get a reply until we were almost 100% finished the Area51 screening process (this was 8 months later, so there's no guarantee that any company would still be interested, plus there is now the COVID-19 economic crisis which might make people less willing to give money). At that time we were told to focus 100% on getting through Area51, and in the last 3 weeks I was focused 100% on "seeding" the brand new Beta, so I could not contact any companies about sponsorship yet. Now that we are well along our way, we can re-visit this issue, and since we have far more users than we had in A51, I think we can discuss this first before approaching sponsors again.

Advantages:

  • All along I have been saying "Let's be good to Stack Exchange":


It would be nice for us to repay the Stack Exchange company, in return for the space we take on their servers, and the bandwidth we consume on their network, and the support we've been getting by the CM team. 15% of the SE workforce was laid off due to COVID-19 and being a site that contributes financially to the company, is better than just being a company that gains from them.

  • As you can see, the "branding" and logos look much nicer for sponsored sites!

  • New users that do not yet have 200 rep, would not have to see ads. A site with ads can have its advantages, but some might also argue that seeing fewer ads enhances the UX (user experience).

Disadvantages:

  • The company/companies that sponsor us, will have their logo on our site all the time (see the logo for "StrangeWorks" on the right-side of the Quantum Computing site banner). While they might be financially endorsing us, we are constantly endorsing them. I would never want to endorse a company that violates my ethical standards, for example.
  • On a sponsored site, we may not have much say in some things: For example on normal sites, the users themselves are the ones that vote on which ads they want to see (e.g. the Materials Modeling Stack Exchange ad was the only one that was negatively voted when the Math.SE community decided which ads they want 😒 ). On QCSE they did not conduct a vote before advertising this book written by the CEO of the company that sponsored them (Whurley is the CEO of StrangeWorks, which is their sites's sponsor):

So it is up to you (the community). Do we prefer sponsorship or no sponsorship while in Beta?

If so, what type of sponsors would you feel comfortable with "endorsing" with their logo on the top-right side of our screen all the time. Companies that sell matter modeling software packages? Materials manufacturing companies? Car companies that have a strong R&D department in Materials Engineering? Pharmaceutical companies that do computational biomaterials/drug design?

| |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There are plenty of launched sites that don't make 10 questions per day and that is fine. Quality over quantity. Numbers lie. This site should do what feels right for it to create content. Community ads won't come until the site is fully graduated (by normal standards). Designs might not even be rolled out when getting launched. $\endgroup$ – Martin - マーチン May 23 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ While it's true that some launched sites don't make 10 questions/day, since a few years ago it has become a minimum requirement to "consistently" be at 10 questions/day to be considered for graduation. As recently as 4 May 2019 former CM Jon Ercison re-affirmed that 10 questions/day was a minimum requirement, but also that it is not a sufficient requirement. I do agree that quality should be maintained though !!! $\endgroup$ – Nike Dattani May 23 at 19:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Martin-γƒžγƒΌγƒγƒ³ as for the rest of your comment: I appreciate that community ads won't come until the site is fully graduated, and that some sites have launched but still not got a custom design. With sponsorship we would get the design right away though (at the expense of having the "community" ads sometimes replaced with ads from the sponsor, which we might not like ... but if there's enough effort from our community in this Meta, we might be able to be firm in telling any potential sponsor what type of ads are acceptable to us). $\endgroup$ – Nike Dattani May 23 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ Barring the company being particularly unsavory or really distant from the scope of the site, I would generally be fine with a sponsor. I guess with the current pandemic and the rarity of sites being sponsored, I would say the more important question is whether a company is even willing to sponsor the site. I think if no one is still offering, it's just a hypothetical. $\endgroup$ – Tyberius May 24 at 21:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As long as people are asking and answering questions here, I'm happy. $\endgroup$ – Kevin J. M. May 26 at 16:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have no issue with sponsoring as the ads do not interfere with the site usability (ads popping up, breaking the fluidity, etc.). $\endgroup$ – Camps Jun 1 at 13:00
  • $\begingroup$ Can we have more than one sponsor? $\endgroup$ – Camps Jun 1 at 13:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .